WG 2 – Detection system performance

Home / Working Groups / WG 2 – Detection system performance

WG 2 – Objectives

WG2 focuses on the detection system, comprising the detection path and its detector(s), and how it measures the signal from the sample.

Members of WG2 aim to standardize the characterization of the detection system performance and create standard procedures for monitoring it over time, thereby revealing performance issues that could affect data reproducibility. Therefore, WG2 will define universal, externally measurable parameters applicable to any type of detector (e.g., photons, linearity, noise), together with measurement tools and protocols for measuring these parameters from common detector types. These universal parameters will be specified according to each distinct type of detector’s internal parameters, which have already been defined by the community. They will enable the evaluation and comparison of different detection systems, thus pinpointing the most suitable technology for given applications.

WG 2 – Co-Chairs

WG 2 - Latest News

We welcome our first member from the China. Xiaoming Li from ShanghaiTech University,  joined the Working Groups 1 to 11. Change the Quality of Light Microscopy Imaging as member of QUAREP-LiMi join us here.

We welcome the first member from the New Zealand. Alfonso Schmidt from Malaghan Institute of Medical Research,  joined the Working Groups 1, 5 and 6. Change the Quality of Light Microscopy Imaging as member of QUAREP-LiMi join us here.

 

Upcoming meeting: 8th September 2025, 5:00 pm
Upcoming meeting: 23rd June 2025, 5:00 pm
Last meeting: 12th May 2025, 5:00 pm

  1. Subgroup: Area detector
    • Aims: Establish protocols for characterization of detection systems with an area detector.
    • Co-leads: Britta Schroth, David McFadden
    • Contact information: schroth@mpi-cbg.de
    • On-going tasks: 
      • Move measurement protocol to protocols.io
      • Test measurement protocol with marker pen as sample
      • Evaluate measurement and analysis parameters written down in Airtable
    • Cloud storage location (can be accessed as a member) → here
  2. Subgroup: Point detector
    • Aims: Establish protocols for characterization of detection systems with a point detector.
    • Co-leads: Gert-Jan Bakker, Andre Zeug
    • Contact information: gert-jan.bakker@radboudumc.nl
    • On-going tasks: 
      • Insert measurement protocol to protocols.io
      • Generate comments and hints for protocol
      • Evaluate measurement and analysis parameters written down in Airtable
    • Cloud storage location (can be accessed as a member) → here
  3. Subgroup: Test sample
    • Aims: investigate and define standardized samples for characterization of detection systems.
    • Co-leads: Valeria Berno, David McFadden
    • Contact information: berno.valeria@hsr.it
    • On-going tasks: 
      • Test and characterize standardized light sources for characterization of microscope’s detection systems.
    • Cloud storage location (can be accessed as a member) → here
  4.  

34th meeting, 11th of September 2023

Meeting date

11/09/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting documentation

33rd meeting, 14th of August 2023

Meeting date

14/08/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting documentation

32nd meeting, 10th of July 2023

Meeting date

10/07/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting documentation

31st meeting, 12th of June 2023

Meeting date

12/06/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting documentation

30th meeting, 8th of May 2023

Meeting date

08/05/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

1) First we discussed some general QUAREP-LiMi news:

– report from the WG9 & co-chairs meeting on May 2nd (feedback from general meeting, QUAREP-LiMi Organigram)

2) Second we talked about the preparation of our contribution for ELMI 2023:

– presenters, preparation support team members, dates for preparation meetings, abstract was sent, date for the actual workshop, which setups will be available

3)  Third, we review the annual meeting:

– intro session: needs to be improved, idea from WG9: have meeting schemes (Spring: external & outreach, Fall: internal – update about work group progress

– our break out room: comments to follow up (advice about when a detector is OK / not OK; make protocol available)

– main panel (great) & general feedback (general goal of QUAREP needs to be made more clear)

– our survey (short look at the results, need to be looked at closer later)

4)  Mathias reported from his EMVA1288 training (will optimize and upload the slides):

– report followed by discussion about how to use the material, how to adapt it to our LiMi needs, we always use EMVA1288 as guidance

5)  Last we postponed David’s report again, to the June meeting and agreed on the next steps.

Meeting documentation

29th meeting, 17th of April 2023

Meeting date

17/04/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

Draft versions of the workgroup presentation and survey for the General assembly meeting were shared and suggestions for improvements were given. Discussion topics for the breakout session were given. Mathias’ report from his EMVA1288 training and the update on David MacFadden’s analysis script will be discussed during the meeting in May.

Meeting documentation

28th meeting, 13th of March 2023

Meeting date

13/03/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

  1. First we discussed some general QUAREP-LiMi news:
    • QUAREP-LiMi is now a community partner of image.sc, we potentially need to contribute to the moderating in the future
    • there is a community room at ELMI for QUAREP and other imaging communities to do 6 workshops, WG2 member contribution is welcome
    • the French MetrologyJ-QC group is very interested in a collaboration with us in WG2, we will invite them to a future WG2 meeting
    • WG12 paper is in the review process of Nature methods
  2. Second we collected ideas on which topics to discuss in the breakout room. It was agreed to especially include open questions and problems: challenge how to measure sensitivity; our strategy of community roll-out; current problems we are facing: UUIDs; data handling, storage, and retrieval. We also collected some potential survey questions. A small team was formed to prepare the breakout room, the short introduction video and questions for a possible survey; all of which will be presented during our next WG2 meeting.
  3. Third followed the reports from the small group measurement teams: for sample preparation, we now have the text for the marker-pen sample on protocols.io (please check it out). A text is planned for the Chromaslide ramp. MathiasH went to the EMVA1288 certification course. He will report in our next meeting.
We closed the meeting by agreeing on the next steps.

Meeting documentation

27th meeting, 13th of February 2023

Meeting date

13/02/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

After first talking about organisational news, we discussed the changes in date and plans for our upcoming QUAREP-LimI general assembly meeting. It is going to be held online on April 26th 2023 3-6PM. We decided that we want to participate with our own breakout room and formed a small preparation team which will also think about potential questions for a survey. A short video presentation needs to be prepared as well. Next the small measurement teams reported their results. Team CET focussed on test samples and found the marker pen as bright enough, easy to prepare and use. Team CET2 focused on the protocol and its usability via protocols.io. There is still a lot of optimization to do (changing the order of the steps, optimizing the run behavior of the protocol). This discussion was followed by the report from our training session with Emma Ganley from the protocols.io team. At the end of the meeting we summarized the main next steps: simplify our protocols and the protocols structure, and updated our detection system behavior measurement excel sheet. The APE measurement reporting session is planned for our June meeting.

Meeting documentation

26th meeting, 9th of January 2023

Meeting date

09/01/2023 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

We used the opportunity of this being the first meeting in 2023 to look back at our achievements, but also challenges, last year. As a main challenge we identified the motivation and organisation for collecting data and analysing it. This is essential to test and optimise our protocols to be able to finalise and subsequently publish them. We therefore decided to form small groups of 3-4 people doing the measurements together. In addition, we discussed to have our aims and next steps smaller and more tight, focus on one aim only. This way we will steadily move forward to eventually reach our goal. Our protocols group gave a brief update on the development of our WG2 protocols in the protocols.io QUAREP-LiMi workspace and informed about the planned training session with Emma Ganley from the protocols.io team. At the end of the meeting we summarised the main next steps: do measurements in the small groups and contact the protocols.io support team about our needs.

Meeting documentation

25th meeting, 12th of December 2022

Meeting date

12/12/2022 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

We started with a brief report from WG9&co-chairs last meeting, focusing mainly on the next general assembly meeting of QUAREP-LiMi. In this meeting, we then had a big discussion on Metadata. There is a specific need of finding a good way to collect, name and recover image files.Try to find an agreement on naming the file isn’t universally acceptable. Therefore, the idea is to find a way to recover the most important metadata on acquisition parameters and device settings in a unique format. Omero could be the answer and it requires a list of metadata. In the same direction is also the request from Nature protocol and other editors for publication.

Meeting documentation

Memberlist WG 2

Last nameFirst NameTownOrganisation AffiliationLab AffiliationCountryTime Zone
Acevedo Luis Overland Park thya Industry US UTC-6
Alshafie Walaa Ashburn Janelia research campus Univ. US UTC-4
Avilov Sergiy Freiburg Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics MPG DE UTC+2
Bakker Gert-Jan Nijmegen NVvM Univ. NL UTC+2
Bammann Rodrigo Uckfield Scientifica Industry GB UTC+1
Banerjee Priyam New York Rockefeller University Univ. US UTC-5
Barna Laszlo Bloomington Indiana University Bloomington Gov. HU UTC+1
Beer Sebastian Hersching Hamamatsu Industry DE UTC+2
Bennett Sarah Coventry University of Warwick Univ. GB UTC+1
Bergles Eric San Jose Pavilion Integration Corporation Industry US UTC-8
Berno Valeria Milano Ospedale San Raffaele- ALEMBIC Gov. IT UTC+2
Bierwagen Jakob Tuebingen AHF Industry DE UTC+2
Boczonadi Veronika Newcastle Newcastle University Univ. GB UTC+-0
Bosch Manel Barcelona University of Barcelona CCITUB Univ. ES UTC+2
Cadby Ashley Sheffield University of Sheffield Univ. GB UTC+-0
Cappellaro Markus München Carl Zeiss Microscopy Industry DE UTC+1
Carvalho Mariana Braga INL – International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory EU-Org PT UTC+-0
Catrina Irina New York Yeshiva University Univ. US UTC-5
Ceccarelli Raino Rome CrestOptics S.p.A. Industry IT UTC+1
Cesbron Yann Klosterneuburg Institute of Science and Technology Austria Gov. AT UTC+1
Chacko Jenu Madison University of Wisconsin-Madison Univ. US UTC-6
Chen Lily Hayward Eikon Therapeutics Industry US UTC-8
Chiritescu Catalin Champaign Phi Optics, Inc. Industry US UTC-6
Christensen Nynne Copenhagen University of Copenhagen, Center for Advanced Bioimaging Univ. DK UTC+1
Clements Darran Cambridge University of Cambridge Univ. GB UTC+1
Cole Louise Sydney University of Technology Univ. AU UTC+11
Cortes Luisa Coimbra Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology Univ. PT UTC+0
Dencevski Aleksa Belgrade Institute of physics Belgrade Univ. CS UTC+1
Dervish Suat Westmead Westmead Institute for Medical Research Gov. AU UTC+10
Diez-Guerra F. Javier Madrid CBMSO (CSIC-UAM) Univ. ES UTC+2
Doherty Glen New York Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Univ. US UTC-4
Drent Peter Amsterdam ONI Industry NL UTC+1
Duong Cao Nguyen Saarbrücken Leibniz Institute for New Materials Leibniz DE UTC+1
Egron Audrey Pessac Argolight Industry FR UTC+1
Eismann Frank Jena Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH Industry DE UTC+2
Eseola Alice Norwich The Sainsbury Laboratory Univ. GB UTC+1
Esner Milan Brno Ceitec Masaryk University Univ. CZ UTC+1
Faklaris Orestis Montpellier RTmfm Univ. FR UTC+2
Fu Yangting Bonn Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e. V. (DZNE) Helmholtz DE UTC+1
Fujimori Toshihiko Okazaki JP BioImaging Gov. JP UTC+9
Garcia Gonzalez Esther Didcot STFC, UKRI Gov. GB UTC+1
Gaudreault Nathalie Seattle Allen Institute Private lab US UTC-7
Gauthier Pascal Jonquiere RioTinto Private lab CA UTC+5
Gharagozlou Shadi Klosterneuburg Institute of science and technology Austria Univ. AT UTC+1
Giles Patrick Uckfield Scientifica Industry GB UTC+-0
Girard Philippe Paris Institut Jacques Monod – Université de Paris Univ. FR UTC+1
Graaff Anko Utrecht Hubrecht Institute Univ. NL UTC+1
Grunwald David Worcester University of Massachusetts Univ. US UTC-4
Gunkel Manuel Heidelberg EMBL Heidelberg EU-Org DE UTC+2
Halter Michael Gaithersburg NIST Gov. US UTC-4
Showing 1 to 50 of 135 entries