WG 11 – Microscopy publication standards

Home / Working Groups / WG 11 – Microscopy publication standards

WG 11 – Objectives

WG11 will work together with scientific publishers to promote the adoption of best practices in the reporting of metadata (for both image acquisition and analysis) throughout scientific journals and books. Only by ensuring all relevant constituents researchers and imaging scientists submitting publications and designing research; editors, scientific publishers, and reviewers monitoring and preparing publications; and funders, researchers, and educators evaluating and disseminating publications) are working in concert can we raise the bar to ensure reproducibility in imaging experiments. WG11 will focus on the following activities: 1) inform scientific publishers of the standards and metadata put forward by the other QUAREP-LiMi Working Groups; 2) liaise with and encourage individual journals to modify their imaging guidelines to align with these recommendations; 3) work together with the scientific publishers to enforce high standards of imaging metadata reporting in all research works accepted for publication; 4) facilitate the involvement of technical reviewers with significant microscopy expertise during the review of papers that rely heavily on imaging techniques; 5) work together with publishers to promote and increase the appropriate acknowledgement and co-authorship of imaging scientists and core imaging facilities in publications; 6) encourage publishers to compel authors to make raw imaging data available if, and when, required for validation of published research and to make reasonable suggestions regarding duration of storage of raw imaging data relevant to published results; 7) propose minimum standards for figure quality, figure colour selection, scale bars, inserts, annotations and labelling, in order to render all microscopy figures easily interpretable by experts and non-experts alike.

WG 11 – Co-Chairs

WG 11 - Latest News

A new working group for “Microscopy publication standards” has been brought to life: WG 11 – Microscopy publication standards

 

Last meeting: 5th March 2026, 11:03 am

A “Bare Minimum Standards for Microscopy Methods Reporting or Establishing Community-Driven Minimal Guidelines for Microscopy Methods Reporting” has been defined bei WG 11.

You can access the guidelines here.

46th meeting, 03rd March 2026

Meeting date

05/03/2026 @ 11:03 AM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

Decide on next chair (Chloe’s torch bearer) Ayse: Discuss her idea of IA she is working on Define what depends on application means. QUAREP-endorsed MicCheck? Review the modalities we already discussed to ensure we are still ok with them.

45th meeting, 22nd January 2026

Meeting date

22/01/2026 @ 11:00 AM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

  1. Update on the JCB paper submission. 
  2. Chloe would like to pass the torch of co-Chair of the WG11 and WG11 representative at the SC. We have a couple of candidates.
  3. Next steps for WG11.

44th meeting, 20th November 2025

Meeting date

20/11/2025 @ 11:00 AM (CET/CEST)

43rd meeting, 23rd October 2025

Meeting date

23/10/2025 @ 11:00 AM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

As promised, we now have a full draft of the manuscript. You are welcome to read it and we will discuss it today.

42nd meeting, 25th September 2025

Meeting date

25/09/2025 @ 11:00 AM (CET/CEST)

41st meeting, 26th of June 2025

Meeting summary

1-Follow up on on last month action item:
  1. Reaching out to STM?
  2. Working on the letter for pre-submission to other journals
2-Vote for WG11 rep at SC

40th meeting, 22nd of May 2025

Meeting date

22/05/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Meeting summary

1-During the last meeting, you expressed your wish to publish the bare minimal list as a standalone document instead of the comprehensive manuscript we were initially envisioning. The main concerns we have are figuring out the type of journal that accepts this format/content and the fact that there are at least 3 publications providing guidelines/checklists for methods reporting. 2-The second action item was to organize the live document that we created a long time ago in which we determined what was level 1 (required), 2 (depends on the application), 3 (nice to have) to build a logic tree for biologists to generate the appropriate checklist depending on the experiment they did.

39th meeting, 24th of April 2025

Meeting date

24/04/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

38th meeting, 27th of March 2025

Meeting date

27/03/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

37th meeting, 27th of February 2025

Meeting date

27/02/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)

Memberlist WG 11