Working Group 1
Quality Assessment and Reproducibility for Instruments & Images in Light Microscopy
The Consortium for Quality Assessment and Reproducibility for Instruments and Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi), formed by the global community of practitioners, researchers, developers, service providers, funders, publishers, policy makers and industry related to the use of light microscopy, is committed to democratizing access to quantitative and reproducible light microscopy and the data generated by it.
Our mission is to provide a comprehensive set of community-agreed guidelines, protocols, automation procedures and other resources aimed at improving quality control, quality assurance, and instrument/method calibration. The stakeholders advocate for the use of the highest level of reproducibility for data generated by light microscopy methods in scientific research and biotechnology applications. In support of achieving its mission, QUAREP-LiMi:
-
sanctions Working Groups to form teams that focus on specific technical or outreach topics;
-
maintains, disseminates, and teaches best practices, protocols, and software tools; and
-
collaborates with providers of reference materials or instrumentation or other tools that enable the easy implementation of best practices at the community level.
We came together in our first online Web meeting on the 28th of April, 2020, with about 50 attendees. By now (24st of April 2024), the network has grown to 620 people from 41 countries worldwide. We have members from academia (research labs, core facilities), national microscopy communities, companies involved in the microscopy business, organizations or institutions related to standardization on a national or international level, and scientific publishers and observers from funding agencies (see the graph below and on the member page for an overview).
Ten working groups (WGs) were established in the 2nd General Meeting on the 9th of July 2020 to bring our common aims quickly forward. Our web page gives an overview of QUAREP-LiMi’s work. In the 3rd General Meeting, WG 11 “Microscopy Publication Standards” and later WGs 12 “Image Visualization and Analysis” and 13 “Phototoxicity” were established. WG 14 “Environment” and 15 “FLIM” are in the process of being established, and WG 8 is restructured to work on “Education, Training and Outreach”.
QUAREP-LiMi operates a NextCloud and an OMERO server, serving as a centralized repository and exchange point for our collective work. These platforms facilitate collaboration and data sharing among our members.
QUAREP-LiMi is absolutely open to new members, and we are looking forward to your contribution. If you are interested in joining our initiative, please fill out our membership form. Use our form for changing your working group (WG) or joining a new WG. For any further questions, please contact us.
{{ecs-article}}
Working Group 2
54th meeting, 8th of September 2025
Meeting date
08/09/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Agenda
- Organizational matters and News
- Update on NBO-Q camera model & glossary
- Updates after the summer break (paper, automation…)
- Decide on next priorities
The meeting welcomed new member Kemp Watson and covered organizational updates from the steering committee, including various project developments and upcoming meetings scheduled for October and November. The working group discussed their focus on detection system performance, including camera models and standardized terminology for microscopy systems, while also addressing the progress of a manuscript related to protocol series. The team reviewed developments of the Nikon toolkit and discussed next steps for their project, including the sequential completion of camera work before moving to other detector types.
53rd meeting, 23rd of June 2025
Meeting date
23/06/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Agenda
- Organizational matters and News
- Report from ELMI 2025
- Update on NBO-Q camera model & glossary
- Report from paper working group
- Next steps
The meeting opened with updates from SC and WG7 meetings, including a report from the NBO-Q camera model and glossary project.
Encouraging news was provided about Nature Publishing Group implementing reproducibility checklists inspired by QUAREP-LiMi’s work. These were mentioned in three recent editorials across major journals. However, concerns were raised as essential information is still missing. A broader conversation on FAIR data sharing followed, highlighting the need to better recognize the cost and effort of data acquisition. QUAREP is encouraged to engage more actively in this direction.
Feedback from ELMI 2025 was very positive—QUAREP-led workshops were well attended and sparked interest among participants, many of whom were new to the initiative. This encouraged us to strengthen our outreach efforts for future international meetings, including next year’s ELMI.
Finally, the paper working group is drafting a publication outlining the foundation of the WG2 protocols. While initial writing has begun, broader input is needed. Future publishing plans for the automation tool and data samples will depend on the setup of OMERO and collaboration with companies.
52nd meeting, 12th of May 2025
Meeting date
12/05/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Agenda
- Organizational matters and News
- QUAREP-LiMi ELMI 2025 workshop contribution
- Report from OMERO subgroup meeting
- Update on NBO-Q camera model & glossary
- Report from paper working group
- Next steps
Summary
We started the meeting with discussing our summer meeting scenario. Due to a public holiday and ELMI 2025, we decided to shift our June meeting to June 23rd. In addition, we decided to skip the meetings in July and August to have time for finishing the camera model and glossary, work on the paper, and have time for vacation. We decided to start again with the regular meeting schedule on September 8th.
This summer meeting organisation was followed by a report from the May steering committee meeting. One great news for WG2 was that the SC endorsed the terminology “dexel” for the detector element versus “pixel” as picture element. Next, we briefly discussed the current status of our ELMI workshop preparation.
This was followed by a report from the QUAREP-LiMi OMERO subgroup meeting. A naming convention was introduced by that subgroup, which everybody needs to follow. We discussed how to implement our spreadsheet terms and how to best automate the upload to OMERO. The WG2 co-chairs will look over tags and naming structure for WG2.
This discussion was followed by an update from the NBO-Q camera model and glossary group. The stakeholder group finished working on the hardware part and will now continue with the settings. The plan is to be finished by the end of this summer.
The WG2 paper working group reported from their first meeting where they summarised paper-related content from our past meeting minutes.
We finalised the meeting with summarising the next steps: finalise the NBO-Q camera model and glossary, work on our paper and collect data for it, support WG7 in their work to calibration metadata, and generalise the automation of our WG2 protocols collection to have it eventually working on all microscopy platforms.
51st meeting, 14th of April 2025
Meeting date
14/04/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
After discussing possible scenarios for our WG2 work during summer, we reported from the SC meeting on April 1st. This was followed by a detailed report from the Annual QUAREP-LiMi Meeting that took place April 10th.
The ELMI contribution preparation team reported the submission of three workshop abstracts. Approval was expected to be highly likely (by now all our submitted workshops have been accepted).
The NBO-Q camera glossary team could report that the hardware part is finished! Next, the settings part will be tackled, but is not expected to take that long. The rest of the meeting we spend on collecting topics for WG2 to work on in the future: automation for our WG2 protocols, paper to accompany our WG2 protocol collection, collect data for it, NBO-Q model update for point detectors, amongst others. For each of these topics we need to find people to take the lead and define respective time lines.
50th meeting, 10th of March 2025
Meeting date
10/03/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Agenda points
- Organizational matters and News
- Report from the Annual QUAREP-LiMi meeting
- ELMI 2025 workshop contribution
- Update on NBO-Q camera model & glossary
- Next steps
Summary
This meeting was a bit of a house-keeping meeting. After the report from the March SC meeting we briefly discusses our planned contributions to the Annual QUAREP-LiMi meeting. This was followed by setting up a time line and preparation group for organising our contribution to ELMI2025. Next, we had a quick update on the current status of our NBO-Q camera model and glossary project. We closed the meeting with discussing the next projects we need to tackle. We will first focus on preparing our paper and organising collection of data. We will also have to revisit our long-term goals as next big projects.49th meeting, 10th of February 2025
Meeting date
10/02/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
This was our first meeting since the publication of our WG2 Protocols collection. Therefore, our main focus was to discuss the next steps for our work.
We agreed on a key concern: how to collect data now that the protocol is available, and how we can assist users in automating the data collection process for use with the analysis tool. We agreed to use OMERO as our main tool. However, this will require significant work. We need to have an easy way to upload data to the OMERO server. Secondly, we need to determine the metadata necessary to support the main detector parameters that can be analysed using our published protocol tools.
Secondly, we got an update on the progress of the Camera Glossary and Model work. The hardware part is almost done. This will be followed by working on the settings part.
Finally, we decided to use the exciting possibility to present our Protocols collection by offering one or two workshops in the community room during the ELMI meeting in June 2025 in Heidelberg.
Working Group 3
Working Group 4
56th meeting, 21st of July 2026
Meeting summary
WG04 had a presentation from one of its members, Junqing, from the National Physical Laboratory, UK, on “Dimensionally Traceable 3D Microstructures for Multimodal Microscope Calibration,” followed by a group discussion. The group then discussed the upcoming group elections (for SC, ERB, and OBs); the current co-chairs stated they are willing to remain in their positions, though new nominations are welcome. The group will set up a nomination/election poll.
54th meeting, 21st of April 2026
Meeting date
21/04/2026 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
The working group discussed the issue of low attendance at meetings and considered the possibility of increasing visibility through social media channels. This matter will be raised with the Steering Committee (SC) for further guidance.
The group also addressed the development of a new protocol for widefield (WF) and spinning disk (SD) microscopy systems. Attending members agreed to prepare an initial draft covering both modalities. MA will share a link to the first version of the protocol ahead of the next meeting to enable further discussion.
Finally, it was noted that the WG04 abstract submitted for a workshop at ELMI 2026 has been accepted.
53rd meeting, 17th of March 2026
Meeting date
17/03/2026 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
The WG was updated by LacJ about the feedback requests from the other WGs and the general news from Quarep‑LiMi. The WG then discussed the abstract outline to be submitted for a workshop at ELMI 2026.
52nd meeting, 17th of February 2026
Meeting date
17/02/2026 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
PS updated the group on the latest news from QUAREP‑LiMi. The group discussed the protocol changes to be implemented. AB presented results obtained on different systems from his facility. Based on these findings, new action items were defined. The next meeting is scheduled for March 23.
Working Group 5
62st meeting, 9th of July 2026
Meeting date
09/07/2026 @ 3:30 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Meeting covered volunteers for elected posts, ELMI feedback, OMERO upload catch up and data collected so far to determine best bead size for ISM based systems. Lastly, a presentation from an intern at the French metrology group detailing software development for identifying aberrant PSFs.
Working Group 6
Working Group 7
Working Group 8
14th meeting, 23rd of April 2025
Meeting date
23/04/2025 @ 4:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Summary (topics discussed): Presented and discussed objectives and survey, provided feedback from GerBI, who saw the survey. Sylvia and Gaby showed the latest changes made to the survey. Asked for more contributions (links were shared again). Angela suggested also we have someone more expert on surveys go through the questions (especially making it quantifiable through better structured Likert scales?).
Once this is sorted the Gaby sends a preview of the survey to all QUAREP for final feedback, on the spirit of opening to all community before going public with results.
We ten plan for a date for releasing if and when there is consensus.
Ask also to vote on whether we can/should ask for email (as optional, never mandatory!).
Working Group 9
Working Group 10
34th meeting, 10th of December 2024
Meeting date
10/12/2024 @ 4:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Presentation by Siân Culley (King’s College London): be there!
30th meeting, 12th of March 2024
Meeting date
12/03/2024 @ 4:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
This meeting will be dedicated to a quick review of the RID parameter, a global discussion about the new parameter AS told us about and importantly, the ByLaws document with the need of volunteer candidates for the various positions (SC, EBR, OB).
Working Group 11
46th meeting, 03rd March 2026
Meeting date
05/03/2026 @ 11:03 AM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Decide on next chair (Chloe’s torch bearer)
Ayse: Discuss her idea of IA she is working on
Define what depends on application means.
QUAREP-endorsed MicCheck?
Review the modalities we already discussed to ensure we are still ok with them.