Working Group 1
Quality Assessment and Reproducibility for Instruments & Images in Light Microscopy
The Consortium for Quality Assessment and Reproducibility for Instruments and Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi), formed by the global community of practitioners, researchers, developers, service providers, funders, publishers, policy makers and industry related to the use of light microscopy, is committed to democratizing access to quantitative and reproducible light microscopy and the data generated by it.
Our mission is to provide a comprehensive set of community-agreed guidelines, protocols, automation procedures and other resources aimed at improving quality control, quality assurance, and instrument/method calibration. The stakeholders advocate for the use of the highest level of reproducibility for data generated by light microscopy methods in scientific research and biotechnology applications. In support of achieving its mission, QUAREP-LiMi:
-
sanctions Working Groups to form teams that focus on specific technical or outreach topics;
-
maintains, disseminates, and teaches best practices, protocols, and software tools; and
-
collaborates with providers of reference materials or instrumentation or other tools that enable the easy implementation of best practices at the community level.
We came together in our first online Web meeting on the 28th of April, 2020, with about 50 attendees. By now (24st of April 2024), the network has grown to 620 people from 41 countries worldwide. We have members from academia (research labs, core facilities), national microscopy communities, companies involved in the microscopy business, organizations or institutions related to standardization on a national or international level, and scientific publishers and observers from funding agencies (see the graph below and on the member page for an overview).
Ten working groups (WGs) were established in the 2nd General Meeting on the 9th of July 2020 to bring our common aims quickly forward. Our web page gives an overview of QUAREP-LiMi’s work. In the 3rd General Meeting, WG 11 “Microscopy Publication Standards” and later WGs 12 “Image Visualization and Analysis” and 13 “Phototoxicity” were established. WG 14 “Environment” and 15 “FLIM” are in the process of being established, and WG 8 is restructured to work on “Education, Training and Outreach”.
QUAREP-LiMi operates a NextCloud and an OMERO server, serving as a centralized repository and exchange point for our collective work. These platforms facilitate collaboration and data sharing among our members.
QUAREP-LiMi is absolutely open to new members, and we are looking forward to your contribution. If you are interested in joining our initiative, please fill out our membership form. Use our form for changing your working group (WG) or joining a new WG. For any further questions, please contact us.
{{ecs-article}}
Working Group 2
12th meeting, 11th of October 2021
Meeting summary
One of the main topics of our meeting was to prepare for the joint meeting with WG7 on establishing standardized vocabulary for describing cameras. The idea for this meeting is to bring together camera manufacturers, microscope companies, and users to agree upon the vocabulary.
In addition, we have to test and finalize both, our measurement and the analysis protocols, by generating more data for determination of the photo-conversion factor (PCF) and background. For that we agreed to use a de-focused Chroma slide edge as main test sample for now.
Last, we discussed how to get more members actively involved and keep the active ones motivated.
11th meeting, 13th of September 2021
Meeting summary
This was the first meeting after the summer break. Therefore we mainly did a status update of the current standing of WG2 and our 4 subgroups (area detector, point detector, analysis, test samples). Mainly, first data sets were collected using the first versions of our measurement protocols. Also, we have a first version of a stand-alone analysis program for retrieving of the photon-conversion factor and dark noise contribution. We discussed the documentation and organization of the data and meta data collected, how to improve it, and how to interact with the MetaDataApp.
Working Group 3
Working Group 4
37th meeting, 21st of May 2024
Meeting date
21/05/2024 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
WG4 acknowledges the acceptance of the QUAREP by-laws. Judith Lacoste serves as the WG4 Steering Committee (SC) representative, Ileana Micu as the Editorial Review Board (ERB) representative, and Christian Kukat as the Ombuds Board (OB) representative. Also, Maria Azevedo is now co-chair with Aurélien Dauphin. An overarching publication involving WG03, WG04, WG05, and a microscope manufacturer was discussed, and suggestions for WG04 representatives to participate were put forward. An update on the naming convention was provided, and the group discussed what should be included for WG04 datasets. Importantly, WG04 will not meet in June; however, an email containing updates on the naming convention and instructions to test OMERO will be sent. The next WG04 meeting is scheduled for July 16th.
36th meeting, 24th of April 2024
Meeting date
24/04/2024 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
A microscope manufacturer is using the QUAREP protocols to provide time-0 measurments before shipping units to its customers. The manufacturer‘s team presented on what seems to be a code implementation issue for the calculation of the reference surface used to calculate the co-registration performance with the tool MetroloJ QC. With the supporting references, they show that the way code is currently written, the 3D reference surface is rendered as a peanut shape instead of an ovoid elongated sphere. As a result of this, the XY and Z co-registration accuracy is not correctly assessed. The authors of MetroloJ_QC will be contacted to present them these findings and ask for feedbacks.
35th meeting, 19th of March 2024
Meeting date
19/03/2024 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
WG04 pursues the analyses of 1um beads datasets for color co-registration, comparing different software. There was a discussion regarding measurements of signal to background ratio on aging bead preparations. The group discussed about how detectors settings and metadata can have an impact on the co-registration analysis results. Please note the next WG04 monthly meeting date. It was moved because of QUAREP annual meeting. Lastly, many thanks to the members who agreed to become co-chairs and representatives of WG-04: Maria Azevedo, Aurélien Dauphin, Christian Kukat, Judith Lacoste and Ileana Micu.
34th meeting, 20th of February 2024
Meeting date
20/02/2024 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Today the proposed QUAREP by-laws were presented. WG04 is grateful to those who worked with David Grunwald for the preparation of this impressive document. The by-laws will be submitted for approval during the QUAREP annual meeting next April. In the mean time, WG04 is asking its members to come forward for the following positions in our workgroup: WG04 co-chairs, a WG04 steering committee representative, a WG04 editorial review board representative and a WG04 ombuds board representative. In addition, QUAREP will need to elect 13 persons on the steering committee and 3 persons on the ombuds board. Our organisation just reached 600 members, for sure there will be new people joining on the above committees to make QUAREP better. Please let us know of your interest in the above positions. A big thanks in advance!
Working Group 5
48th meeting, 14th of April 2025
Meeting date
14/04/2025 @ 3:30 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
The protocol V2 was discussed and it was voted to pass the next version of the protocol to the SC.
For the upcoming ELMI workshop, plans were initiated to host a one-hour session, considering point source and line patterns, and coordinating tasks among participants.
An update on the paper shared insights on confocal SBR and r² values, noting differences due to noise factors. Discussions included data analysis techniques and the challenges of data variance over time. The meeting concluded with a call for organizing data in OMERO and an update on a new ISO norm for metadata, inviting community participation. The next meeting is postponed by a week to accommodate a French national holiday.
Working Group 6
Working Group 7
29th meeting, 17th of June 2024
Meeting date
17/06/2024 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Julio presented an extension to OMERO for tracking metrology data. During the discussion next steps were discussed which included attending WGs 3, 4, and 5 and presenting the work in order to align the metadata schema. There were also extended discussions about recent events, e.g., at OME2024 and ELMI2024.
Working Group 8
Working Group 9
Working Group 10
27th meeting, 11th of April 2023
Meeting date
11/04/2023 @ 4:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
For this meeting, we will need to take a decision about SBR parameter and all over parameter we decided not to consider.
+ 10 min per sub group to discuss briefly the progresses that have been made.
+ preparation of the Annual meeting
Working Group 11
33rd 10th of October 2024
Meeting date
10/10/2024 @ 11:00 AM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Paula shares that bare-minimum checklist is moving forward. It took on new momentum at BINA meeting. SC endorsed content at Oct. SC meeting. Caterina and Judith are aligning with NBO-Q schema.
Some topics have been discussed.
Decission Tree for chosing reporting structure. Paula collected input from last meeting
MicCheck tree updates. is there a way to align MicCheck with quarep work?
Can users actually answer questions at the level of MicCheck?