Working Group 1
Quality Assessment and Reproducibility for Instruments & Images in Light Microscopy
The Consortium for Quality Assessment and Reproducibility for Instruments and Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi), formed by the global community of practitioners, researchers, developers, service providers, funders, publishers, policy makers and industry related to the use of light microscopy, is committed to democratizing access to quantitative and reproducible light microscopy and the data generated by it.
Our mission is to provide a comprehensive set of community-agreed guidelines, protocols, automation procedures and other resources aimed at improving quality control, quality assurance, and instrument/method calibration. The stakeholders advocate for the use of the highest level of reproducibility for data generated by light microscopy methods in scientific research and biotechnology applications. In support of achieving its mission, QUAREP-LiMi:
-
sanctions Working Groups to form teams that focus on specific technical or outreach topics;
-
maintains, disseminates, and teaches best practices, protocols, and software tools; and
-
collaborates with providers of reference materials or instrumentation or other tools that enable the easy implementation of best practices at the community level.
We came together in our first online Web meeting on the 28th of April, 2020, with about 50 attendees. By now (24st of April 2024), the network has grown to 620 people from 41 countries worldwide. We have members from academia (research labs, core facilities), national microscopy communities, companies involved in the microscopy business, organizations or institutions related to standardization on a national or international level, and scientific publishers and observers from funding agencies (see the graph below and on the member page for an overview).
Ten working groups (WGs) were established in the 2nd General Meeting on the 9th of July 2020 to bring our common aims quickly forward. Our web page gives an overview of QUAREP-LiMi’s work. In the 3rd General Meeting, WG 11 “Microscopy Publication Standards” and later WGs 12 “Image Visualization and Analysis” and 13 “Phototoxicity” were established. WG 14 “Environment” and 15 “FLIM” are in the process of being established, and WG 8 is restructured to work on “Education, Training and Outreach”.
QUAREP-LiMi operates a NextCloud and an OMERO server, serving as a centralized repository and exchange point for our collective work. These platforms facilitate collaboration and data sharing among our members.
QUAREP-LiMi is absolutely open to new members, and we are looking forward to your contribution. If you are interested in joining our initiative, please fill out our membership form. Use our form for changing your working group (WG) or joining a new WG. For any further questions, please contact us.
{{ecs-article}}
Working Group 2
12th meeting, 11th of October 2021
Meeting summary
One of the main topics of our meeting was to prepare for the joint meeting with WG7 on establishing standardized vocabulary for describing cameras. The idea for this meeting is to bring together camera manufacturers, microscope companies, and users to agree upon the vocabulary.
In addition, we have to test and finalize both, our measurement and the analysis protocols, by generating more data for determination of the photo-conversion factor (PCF) and background. For that we agreed to use a de-focused Chroma slide edge as main test sample for now.
Last, we discussed how to get more members actively involved and keep the active ones motivated.
11th meeting, 13th of September 2021
Meeting summary
This was the first meeting after the summer break. Therefore we mainly did a status update of the current standing of WG2 and our 4 subgroups (area detector, point detector, analysis, test samples). Mainly, first data sets were collected using the first versions of our measurement protocols. Also, we have a first version of a stand-alone analysis program for retrieving of the photon-conversion factor and dark noise contribution. We discussed the documentation and organization of the data and meta data collected, how to improve it, and how to interact with the MetaDataApp.
Working Group 3
Working Group 4
49th meeting, 16th of September 2025
Meeting date
16/09/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
LacJ updated the group on the latest news from QUAREP-LiMi. The group then discussed the results and the discussion section of the protocol, and it was agreed to include the data obtained using MetroloJ_QC, where the experimental distance is normalized to the reference distance. The group also addressed the naming convention, in light of the new data being generated for both widefield (WF) and spinning disk confocal (SDC) systems.
48th meeting, 17h of June 2025
Meeting date
17/06/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
LacJ presented a report from the last SC meeting. AzeM informed the group that a new OB representative is needed. The group discussed the recent modifications to the protocol made by DauA and agreed on the next steps to finalize it: DauA and AzeM will collaborate on developing the discussion section. It was also decided to begin acquiring new datasets using widefield (WF) and spinning disk confocal (SDC) systems. A new batch of slides containing 1 µm TetraSpeck beads will be sent to those interested in acquiring images. The group will take a summer break in July and August, with the next meeting scheduled for September 16th.
46th meeting, 15th of April 2025
Meeting date
15/04/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
WG04 members began the meeting by discussing feedback from the annual meeting. The author list on protocols.io was also addressed, and it was agreed that all co-authors should enter their full institutional address in the affiliation section under the “Organization” sub-tab.
The group also discussed the upload of WG04 data into OMERO and reviewed the adopted naming conventions.
Regarding next steps, members agreed to move forward with improving the first version of the WG04 protocol. The immediate goal is to adapt the protocol for use on confocal spinning disk and widefield microscopy systems.
44th meeting, 18th of February 2025
Meeting date
18/02/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
In the latest WG04 meeting, members reviewed the feedback received from a co-chair of another WG on the first version of the protocol. Final adjustments were discussed and agreed upon to refine the document before publication. Additionally, the group addressed authorship matters, ensuring proper acknowledgment of contributions and clarifying the necessary updates to affiliations on protocols.io.
Working Group 5
Working Group 6
Working Group 7
29th meeting, 17th of June 2024
Meeting date
17/06/2024 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
Julio presented an extension to OMERO for tracking metrology data. During the discussion next steps were discussed which included attending WGs 3, 4, and 5 and presenting the work in order to align the metadata schema. There were also extended discussions about recent events, e.g., at OME2024 and ELMI2024.
Working Group 8
Working Group 9
Working Group 10
22nd meeting, 11th of October 2022
Meeting date
11/10/2022 @ 4:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
The WG10 is back after summer break. A new organization will be proposed and a distribution of the tasks to be accomplished will be made.
A V2 document will be presented too.
We hope to see many of you on this occasion!
Working Group 11
40th meeting, 22nd of May 2025
Meeting date
22/05/2025 @ 5:00 PM (CET/CEST)
Meeting summary
1-During the last meeting, you expressed your wish to publish the bare minimal list as a standalone document instead of the comprehensive manuscript we were initially envisioning. The main concerns we have are figuring out the type of journal that accepts this format/content and the fact that there are at least 3 publications providing guidelines/checklists for methods reporting.
2-The second action item was to organize the live document that we created a long time ago in which we determined what was level 1 (required), 2 (depends on the application), 3 (nice to have) to build a logic tree for biologists to generate the appropriate checklist depending on the experiment they did.